Donahue v. Romahn

10 A.D.2d 637, 196 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, the appeal is from an order which (1) granted a motion for summary judgment striking out the answer, and (2) directed an assessment of damages. Respondent was asleep in the motor vehicle, which she owned and which was being operated by appellant, when he fell asleep or “blacked out” and it veered to the left and collided with a telephone pole, causing the injuries complained of. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. The record presents triable issues which may not be resolved on a motion for summary judgment (Phelan v. Houghton, 9 A D 2d 767, revg. 16 Misc 2d 227; Butler v. Albert, 1 A D 2d 43), Nolan, P. J., Ughetta. Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donahue v. Romahn, 10 A.D.2d 637, 196 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 637 (Donahue v. Romahn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzgerald v. Sanitation District No. 6
116 Misc. 2d 325 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)