Donahue v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.

68 N.Y.S. 1137

This text of 68 N.Y.S. 1137 (Donahue v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donahue v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 68 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that evidence tending to show the pecuniary circumstances of the next of kin at the time of the death of the plaintiff’s intestate is competent (see. Fowler v. Furnace Co., 41 App. Div. 84, 58 N. Y. Supp. 223, and cases cited); but, considering the amount of the verdict, the nature of the questions propounded, and all the circumstances, we think no reversible error was committed by the learned trial justice in excluding the evidence offered upon the subject. We have also considered the other questions discussed upon appellant’s brief, and find no reversible error therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fowler v. Buffalo Furnace Co.
41 A.D. 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donahue-v-new-york-ontario-western-railway-co-nyappdiv-1901.