Donahue v. CTL Distribution

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Donahue v. CTL Distribution

682 So. 2d 1218, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12123, 1996 WL 670470

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2314

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 682 So. 2d 1218 (Donahue v. CTL Distribution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donahue v. CTL Distribution, 682 So. 2d 1218, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12123, 1996 WL 670470 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

At issue in this workers’ compensation ease is appellant’s entitlement to wage-loss benefits during certain periods before and after termination of his employment with appellee CTL Distribution. We affirm that portion of the order on appeal awarding wage-loss based upon deemed earnings from August 28,1994, to October 31,1994, because that award is supported by competent substantial evidence. The employer concedes, however, that deemed earnings may not be properly applied to wage-loss for periods of time after October 31, 1994. Accordingly, the allowance of deemed earnings for those periods after October 31, 1994, is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

KAHN, J., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur. ERVIN, J., concurs and dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At issue in this workers’ compensation ease is appellant’s entitlement to wage-loss benefits during certain periods before and after termination of his employment with appellee CTL Distribution. We affirm that portion of the order on appeal awarding wage-loss based upon deemed earnings from August 28,1994, to October 31,1994, because that award is supported by competent substantial evidence. The employer concedes, however, that deemed earnings may not be properly applied to wage-loss for periods of time after October 31, 1994. Accordingly, the allowance of deemed earnings for those periods after October 31, 1994, is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

KAHN, J., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur. ERVIN, J., concurs and dissents with written opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 So. 2d 1218, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12123, 1996 WL 670470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donahue-v-ctl-distribution-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack