Donahou v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided February 13, 2023·No. 4:19-cv-00857·Unknown

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION LEAH DONAHOU PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:19-cv-00857-KGB COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT

ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff Leah Donahou’s request for EAJA attorney fees and costs under the Equal Access To Justice Act (Dkt. No. 15). Ms. Donahou requests $5,961.50 in attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access To Justice Act (““EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Dkt. No. 15-1, at 6-7). The Commissioner has responded and does not object to an award of $5,961.50 in attorney’s fees and costs (Dkt. No. 17, at 1). For good cause shown, the Court grants Ms. Donahou’s motion (Dkt. No. 15). After review of the record, the Court finds that the hours spent by counsel were reasonable. The Court approves $5,961.50 in attorney’s fees and costs. The EAJA fee award shall be made payable to Ms. Donahou in the care of and mailed to her counsel, but subject to any offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt owed by Ms. Donahou to the United States. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010) (holding that an award of fees under the EAJA is payable to the litigant and is therefore subject to a government offset to satisfy the litigant’s pre- existing debt to the United States). The Commissioner shall certify this award. It is so ordered this 13th day of February, 2023. Kush 4. Palun— Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donahou v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Ark. 2023).

Donahou v. Social Security Administration (Donahou v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)