Donahoe v. Surman's Inc.

133 N.E.2d 245, 334 Mass. 702
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 28, 1956·Published

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort by a customer (with a count for consequential damages by her husband) against the owner of a store for injuries allegedly due to negligently maintained premises. Under leave reserved, the judge entered verdicts for the defendant, and the plaintiffs excepted. There was no error. In the opinion of a majority of the court, there was no evidence of the defendant’s negligence. As we view the record, the female plaintiff stepped backward into a fully lighted stairway in a manner not reasonably to be anticipated by the defendant, which, in the circumstances, owed no duty to warn. Hunnewell v. Haskell, 174 Mass. 557. Flynn v. Cities Service Refining Co. 306 Mass. 302. Lookner v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 333 Mass. 555. The plaintiffs, upon whom rest the burden of showing error, have not brought their ease within Grogan v. O’Keeffe’s Inc. 267 Mass. 189, Coates v. First National Stores Inc. 322 Mass. 563, and Giacomuzzi v. Klein, 324 Mass. 689.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donahoe v. Surman's Inc., 133 N.E.2d 245, 334 Mass. 702 (Mass. 1956).

133 N.E.2d 245 (Donahoe v. Surman's Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunnewell v. Haskell
55 N.E. 320 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Grogan v. O'Keeffe's Inc.
166 N.E. 721 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Flynn v. Cities Service Refining Co.
28 N.E.2d 453 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Coates v. First National Stores Inc.
78 N.E.2d 501 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Giacomuzzi v. Klein
88 N.E.2d 548 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
Lookner v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
132 N.E.2d 160 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1956)