Donaghe v. Rankin
4 Munf. 261, 18 Va. 261, 1814 Va. LEXIS 39
Opinion
the president pronounced the court's opinion as follows :
“ The declaration, in this case, containing a mere recital of slanderous words, and no direct charge that those words were spoken of the plaintiff by the defendant, the court is of opinion, that it is insufficient to maintain the action. The judgment is therefore reversed with costs.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donaghe v. Rankin, 4 Munf. 261, 18 Va. 261, 1814 Va. LEXIS 39 (Va. 1814).
4 Munf. 261 (Donaghe v. Rankin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. Montgomery
72 S.E. 1087 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1911)
Spiker v. Bohrer
16 S.E. 575 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1892)
Battrell v. Ohio River R'y Co.
11 L.R.A. 290 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1890)
Burton & Co. v. Hansford
10 W. Va. 470 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1877)
Bourland v. Eidson
8 Va. 27 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1851)