Donadia v. Menze

City of New York Municipal Court

Donadia v. Menze

22 Misc. 766, 49 N.Y.S. 1134

DecidedFebruary 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Misc. 766 (Donadia v. Menze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donadia v. Menze, 22 Misc. 766, 49 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Conlan, J.

TMs is an appeal from an order vacating an attach-' merit on the ground that the affidavit does not comply "with the requirements of subdivision 3 of ¡section 3169 of the Code of Civil Procedure. "

We think the languag'e employed brings the case fully within the meaning and spirit ;of the section quoted, and that the order appealed from should be reversed. Order reversed with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Sohuohman, J., concur,

Order reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conlan, J.

TMs is an appeal from an order vacating an attach-' merit on the ground that the affidavit does not comply "with the requirements of subdivision 3 of ¡section 3169 of the Code of Civil Procedure. "

We think the languag'e employed brings the case fully within the meaning and spirit ;of the section quoted, and that the order appealed from should be reversed. Order reversed with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Sohuohman, J., concur,

Order reversed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Misc. 766, 49 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donadia-v-menze-nynyccityct-1898.