Don Victor Harbolt, Jr. v. Noah L. Alldredge, Warden

432 F.2d 441
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 1970
Docket295-70
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 432 F.2d 441 (Don Victor Harbolt, Jr. v. Noah L. Alldredge, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Don Victor Harbolt, Jr. v. Noah L. Alldredge, Warden, 432 F.2d 441 (10th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon docketing, this case was assigned to the summary calendar in view of the unsubstantial questions involved and Harbolt was given an opportunity to address the underlying merits and oppose summary action, which he has done.

A thorough review of the files and records in this case, along with the papers submitted by Harbolt, convinces us that the judgment of the district court is correct and that there is no necessity for further argument.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in 311 F.Supp. 688 (W.D.Okl. 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kermicle v. Day
428 F. Supp. 16 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1976)
Douglas v. U. S. Attorney General
404 F. Supp. 1314 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1975)
United States v. Steel
400 F. Supp. 39 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1975)
Rojelio E. Rivera v. E. O. Toft, Warden
477 F.2d 534 (Tenth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 F.2d 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/don-victor-harbolt-jr-v-noah-l-alldredge-warden-ca10-1970.