Don v. Benjamin M. Knapp, Inc.

281 A.D. 892, 119 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3700
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant Hasinsky from so much of an order as denies his motion to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff Elizabeth Don for failure to state a cause of action. Said complaint sets forth a purported cause of action in favor of said plaintiff for loss of services and consortium resulting from injuries to her husband, allegedly [893]*893caused by the negligence of the defendants. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The complaint of respondent Elizabeth Don fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Passalacqua V. Draper, 279 App. Div. 660.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Don v. Benjamin M. Knapp, Inc., 281 A.D. 892, 119 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 892 (Don v. Benjamin M. Knapp, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Dautel
388 P.2d 615 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1964)