Don Paul Carter v. Suzanne Marie Sulewski

Court of Appeals of Texas

Don Paul Carter v. Suzanne Marie Sulewski

DecidedApril 30, 2010

Docket12-10-00116-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Don Paul Carter v. Suzanne Marie Sulewski (Don Paul Carter v. Suzanne Marie Sulewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Don Paul Carter v. Suzanne Marie Sulewski, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00116-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS DON PAUL CARTER, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 349TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SUZANNE MARIE SULEWSKI, ' HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant Don Paul Carter has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. In his motion, Carter he has recently discovered that the issue he sought to appeal has not been severed by the trial court and therefore the judgment appealed from is interlocutory. Because Carter has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Opinion delivered April 30, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-10-00116-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS DON PAUL CARTER, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 349TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SUZANNE MARIE SULEWSKI, ' HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant Don Paul Carter has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. In his motion, Carter he has recently discovered that the issue he sought to appeal has not been severed by the trial court and therefore the judgment appealed from is interlocutory. Because Carter has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Opinion delivered April 30, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Don Paul Carter v. Suzanne Marie Sulewski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/don-paul-carter-v-suzanne-marie-sulewski-texapp-2010.