Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. Pullum
This text of 352 So. 2d 107 (Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. Pullum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari filed by petitioner, Don Mott Agency, Inc., is granted, and the order of the trial court granting the motions of respondent, Byrd Pullum, to quash a subpoena duces tecum and for a protective order is reversed.
Respondent Pullum did not show by a timely motion to quash that the subpoena duces tecum requested by petitioner is “unreasonable and oppressive” as required by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.410(b) nor show by a motion for a protective order that good cause is present to limit or prohibit the discovery sought by petitioner due to “annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense” as required by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(c).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 So. 2d 107, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/don-mott-agency-inc-v-pullum-fladistctapp-1977.