Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. Pullum

352 So. 2d 107, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16778
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 1977
DocketNo. 77-547
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 352 So. 2d 107 (Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. Pullum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Don Mott Agency, Inc. v. Pullum, 352 So. 2d 107, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari filed by petitioner, Don Mott Agency, Inc., is granted, and the order of the trial court granting the motions of respondent, Byrd Pullum, to quash a subpoena duces tecum and for a protective order is reversed.

Respondent Pullum did not show by a timely motion to quash that the subpoena duces tecum requested by petitioner is “unreasonable and oppressive” as required by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.410(b) nor show by a motion for a protective order that good cause is present to limit or prohibit the discovery sought by petitioner due to “annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense” as required by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(c).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Egly
507 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Insurance Co. of N. America v. Noya
398 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 So. 2d 107, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/don-mott-agency-inc-v-pullum-fladistctapp-1977.