Don McCullagh Leasing, Inc. v. Amos

Michigan Court of Appeals

Don McCullagh Leasing, Inc. v. Amos

168 N.W.2d 471, 16 Mich. App. 568, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1422

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 1969·No. Docket No. 4,252·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff; brought action against the defendant for damages incurred by plaintiff through the negligent operation of defendant’s automobile. The court returned a judgment of no cause of action.

Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, which was denied by the trial judge.

A review of the record indicates that the plaintiff did not comply with common pleas court rule No 18. Also the plaintiff did not show that with reasonable diligence he could not have discovered and produced such evidence at trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff; brought action against the defendant for damages incurred by plaintiff through the negligent operation of defendant’s automobile. The court returned a judgment of no cause of action.

Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, which was denied by the trial judge.

A review of the record indicates that the plaintiff did not comply with common pleas court rule No 18. Also the plaintiff did not show that with reasonable diligence he could not have discovered and produced such evidence at trial.

Affirmed.

Don McCullagh Leasing, Inc. v. Amos, 168 N.W.2d 471, 16 Mich. App. 568, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1422 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

168 N.W.2d 471 (Don McCullagh Leasing, Inc. v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.