DON K. JURAVIN vs DCS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND THE CLUB AT BELLA COLLINA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 2022
Docket22-1058
StatusPublished

This text of DON K. JURAVIN vs DCS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND THE CLUB AT BELLA COLLINA (DON K. JURAVIN vs DCS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND THE CLUB AT BELLA COLLINA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DON K. JURAVIN vs DCS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND THE CLUB AT BELLA COLLINA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DON K. JURAVIN,

Petitioner, Case No. 5D22-1058 v. LT Case No. 2017-CA-0667

DCS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS,LLC, AND THE CLUB AT BELLA COLLINA,

Respondents.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 17, 2022

Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Dan R. Mosley, Respondent Judge.

Andrew A. Labbe, of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.

Michael D. Crosbie, and Caitlin N. Emling, of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Orlando, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Don K. Juravin petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition, challenging

the trial court’s refusal to stay the underlying proceedings despite the declaration of insolvency obtained and filed by Juravin’s insurer. It is

undisputed that the insurer has declared insolvency and has entered

receivership, and that the trial court has refused to stay the proceedings

“because the insurer is not a named party to the lawsuit.” This was error.

Section 631.67, Florida Statutes (2021), provides that all proceedings

in which an insolvent insurer is a party or is obligated to defend a party shall

be stayed for six months. This Court has previously held that the stay

provided for in section 631.67 is both automatic and mandatory, and that the

stay must be to the entire proceeding. Halili v. Radiation Oncology

Consultants, P.A., 820 So. 2d 415, 416–17 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Jimmy

Lang’s Auto Serv. v. Proctor, 667 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)). We agree

with Juravin that the six-month stay (from the February 25, 2022 insolvency

order) provided by the statute prohibits continuation of these judicial

proceedings so long as Juravin’s insurer remains obligated to provide a

defense.

PETITION GRANTED.

EVANDER, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jimmy Lang's Auto Service v. Proctor
667 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Halili v. RADIATION ONCOLOGY CONSULT., PA
820 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DON K. JURAVIN vs DCS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND THE CLUB AT BELLA COLLINA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/don-k-juravin-vs-dcs-real-estate-investments-llc-and-the-club-at-bella-fladistctapp-2022.