Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening

237 F.2d 918
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1956
Docket12737
StatusPublished

This text of 237 F.2d 918 (Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening, 237 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the -transcript of the record, the-briefs of the parties, and the argument, of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged,, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Starr, 134 F.Supp. 572.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Co.
134 F. Supp. 572 (W.D. Michigan, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/don-e-hughes-v-salem-co-operative-company-inc-and-prater-pulverizer-ca6-1956.