Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening

237 F.2d 918
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 17, 1956·No. 12737·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the -transcript of the record, the-briefs of the parties, and the argument, of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged,, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Starr, 134 F.Supp. 572.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening, 237 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1956).

237 F.2d 918 (Don E. Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Company, Inc., and Prater Pulverizer Company, Intervening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hughes v. Salem Co-Operative Co.
134 F. Supp. 572 (W.D. Michigan, 1955)