Don Cesar Property Owners Corp. v. Gallagher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Don Cesar Property Owners Corp. v. Gallagher

452 So. 2d 1047, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13827

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 1984·No. No. 83-2325·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the court’s determination that a covenant providing that appel-lees’ property shall be “for residence only” does not prohibit the erection of townhouse condominiums. This restriction relates to the use or mode of occupancy to which the property may be put rather than the nature of the structure to be erected thereon. Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901 (1925). Cf. Mayes v. Hale, 82 Fla. 35, 89 So. 364 (1921) (holding that the erection of an apartment house violated a covenant that the property should “be used for residential purposes only, and only one residence is to be erected on each lot”). We also conclude that there is ample evidence to support the court’s finding that, in any event, appellants cannot enforce the covenant because of acquiescence, waiver and [1048] abandonment/ See Stephl v. Moore, 94 Fla. 313, 114 So. 455 (1927).

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the court’s determination that a covenant providing that appel-lees’ property shall be “for residence only” does not prohibit the erection of townhouse condominiums. This restriction relates to the use or mode of occupancy to which the property may be put rather than the nature of the structure to be erected thereon. Moore v. Stevens, 90 Fla. 879, 106 So. 901 (1925). Cf. Mayes v. Hale, 82 Fla. 35, 89 So. 364 (1921) (holding that the erection of an apartment house violated a covenant that the property should “be used for residential purposes only, and only one residence is to be erected on each lot”). We also conclude that there is ample evidence to support the court’s finding that, in any event, appellants cannot enforce the covenant because of acquiescence, waiver and [1048] abandonment/ See Stephl v. Moore, 94 Fla. 313, 114 So. 455 (1927).

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Don Cesar Property Owners Corp. v. Gallagher, 452 So. 2d 1047, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

452 So. 2d 1047 (Don Cesar Property Owners Corp. v. Gallagher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related