Don Abbott Holmes and Gayle Eiser Holmes v. Jetall Companies, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 8, 2015·No. 01-15-00326-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-15-00326-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 5:48:42 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

No. 01-15-00326-CV

FILED IN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 1st COURT OF APPEALS FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 5:48:42 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk DON ABBOTT HOLMES, GAYLE EISLER HOLMES, and the COMMUNITY PROPERTY ESTATE OF DON ABBOTT HOLMES and GALE EISLER HOLMES,

V.

JETALL COMPANIES, INC.

On Appeal from the 127th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas

APPELLEE’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

Lee Keller King Texas Bar No. 00792016 2500 West Loop South Suite 255 Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 789-7654 (713) 789-3331 fax Lee.k@jetallcompanies.com

Attorney for Appellee

Appellee’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief Page 1 APPELLEE’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

Appellee, Jetall Companies, Inc., asks the Court to extend the time to file its Appellee’s

Brief, and would show as follows.

A. Introduction

1. Appellants are Don Abbott Holmes, Gayle Eisler Holmes, and The Community

Property Estate Of Don Abbott Holmes and Gale Eisler Holmes. Appellee is Jetall Companies,

Inc.

2. This motion is filed before the deadline for Appellee to file its Appellee’s Brief.

3. Counsel for Appellants has agreed to the granting of the relief sought in this motion.

B. Argument & Authorities

4. The Court may grant an extension of time under the authority of Rule 38.6(d) of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

5. The deadline to file Appellee’s Brief is September 9, 2015 and this motion is filed

prior to that date.

6. Appellee requests an additional 30 days to file its Appellee’s Brief, extending the

time until Friday, October 9, 2015.

7. No extension has been granted to extend the time to file Appellee’s Brief.

8. The Court has previously been granted a 30-day extension to file their Appellants’

Brief.

9. Appellee needs additional time to file Appellee’s Brief because of difficulties in

obtaining appellate counsel.

Appellee’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief Page 2 C. Conclusion

10. Appellee has shown that Appellants are agreed to the granting of this motion, the

Court has the authority to grant Appellee an extension, that no previous extension has been granted

and there is good cause to grant the requested extension.

D. Prayer

11. For these reasons, Appellee asks the Court to grant an extension of time to file

Appellee’s Brief until Friday, October 9, 2015.

/s/Lee Keller King Texas Bar No. 00792016 2500 West Loop South Suite 255 Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 789-7654 (713) 789-3331 fax Lee.k@jetallcompanies.com

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I conferred with Mr. Martin J. Siegel, counsel for Appellants, by telephone on

September 8, 2015, and he has agreed and is unopposed to the forgoing Appellee’s Motion to

Extend Time.

/s/ Lee Keller King

Appellee’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a copy of the forgoing motion on all counsel of record, as

listed below, via electronic service on September 8, 2015.

Martin J. Siegel Texas State Bar No. 18342125 LAW OFFICES OF MARTIN J. SIEGEL, P.C. Bank of America Center 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 Houston, TX 77002 Tel.: (713) 226-8566 Martin@siegelfirm.com

Geoffrey Berg Texas Bar No. 00793330 BERG FELDMAN JOHNSON BELL, LLP 4203 Montrose Blvd., Suite 150 Houston, Texas 77006 Tel.: (713) 526-0200 Gberg@bfjblaw.com

Appellee’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellee’s Brief Page 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Don Abbott Holmes and Gayle Eiser Holmes v. Jetall Companies, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Don Abbott Holmes and Gayle Eiser Holmes v. Jetall Companies, Inc. (Don Abbott Holmes and Gayle Eiser Holmes v. Jetall Companies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.