Domond v. State

981 So. 2d 603, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6854, 2008 WL 2038040
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2008
DocketNo. 3D08-684
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 981 So. 2d 603 (Domond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Domond v. State, 981 So. 2d 603, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6854, 2008 WL 2038040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny without prejudice Emmanuel Domond’s (“Domond”) petition for writ of mandamus, where he seeks to compel the trial court to rule on his motion to correct sentence. Domond asserts that he filed his motion on or about December 27, 2006. The State of Florida, however, has responded that it is unable to locate a copy of the motion. Additionally, the clerk of the circuit court has also been unable to locate the motion in question. Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice for Domond to re-file his motion in order that the trial court may timely rule on it. If Domond re-files his motion, we direct him to serve a copy of the motion with the Office of the Attorney General.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CERNADAS v. State
981 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
981 So. 2d 603, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6854, 2008 WL 2038040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domond-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.