Domnick v. Ware

240 So. 2d 654, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5644
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 1970·No. No. 70-210·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order of dismissal in a suit wherein he sought to recover certain property allegedly in the possession of an estate represented by the appellee. We affirm.

No claim was filed under § 733.16(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., to “personal property in the possession of the personal representative” within the time provided for therein. The complaint not alleging that the deceased held the property in question in a fiduciary capacity [e. g., Hodges v. Logan, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 885; Buck v. McNab, Fla.App.1962, 139 So.2d 734], the appellant is relegated to his rights under § 733.-16(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Therefore, it affirmatively failing to appear that a claim had been filed and rejected within the statutory time, the trial judge was correct in dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Price v. Davis, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 474; Hathaway v. Boyd, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 8.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Domnick v. Ware, 240 So. 2d 654, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5644 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

240 So. 2d 654 (Domnick v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buck v. McNab
139 So. 2d 734 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Hodges v. Logan
82 So. 2d 885 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Price v. Davis
180 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Hathaway v. Boyd
192 So. 2d 8 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)