Domino v. Mercurio

193 N.E.2d 893, 13 N.Y.2d 922
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 1963·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The existence of issues of fact with respect to negligence was conceded by the failure of defendants to move to dismiss at the conclusion of the case. The Appellate Division, in the exercise of its power to reverse in the interests of justice, examined the issue of whether defendant Board of Education was liable in any event. This court, however, cannot reach that issue since no exception was taken to the trial court’s submission of that issue to the jury.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fold, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Domino v. Mercurio, 193 N.E.2d 893, 13 N.Y.2d 922 (N.Y. 1963).

193 N.E.2d 893 (Domino v. Mercurio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hecker v. State
987 N.E.2d 636 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
Murray v. Watervliet City School District
130 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Dudley v. William Penn College
219 N.W.2d 484 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1974)