Dominique Taylor v. Angela Faye Brown & Associates, PLLC. and Angela Faye Brown
This text of Dominique Taylor v. Angela Faye Brown & Associates, PLLC. and Angela Faye Brown (Dominique Taylor v. Angela Faye Brown & Associates, PLLC. and Angela Faye Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 23, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00418-CV ——————————— DOMINIQUE TAYLOR, Appellant V. ANGELA FAYE BROWN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC AND ANGELA FAYE BROWN, Appellees
On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-13521
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant filed his notice of appeal on April 21, 2026, seeking to appeal the
trial court’s order signed 140 days earlier, on December 2, 2025, dismissing his case.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require a notice of appeal to be filed within
30 days after the final judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. This deadline may be extended for 90 days if certain post-judgment motions are timely filed. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). The deadline for filing may also be extended by the filing
of a motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. “[A] timely
filed notice of appeal confers jurisdiction on this court, and absent a timely
filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal.” Campbell v. Leal, No. 04-12-
00654-CV, 2012 WL 5874622, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 21, 2012, no
pet.) (mem. op.) (internal citation omitted).
We notified Appellant that his case was subject to dismissal. Appellant
responded that we should construe his appeal as challenging the March 25, 2026
order denying his motion to reinstate and motion for new trial, which he asserts was
signed less than 30 days prior to the appeal. But we have no authority to do so. This
Court’s jurisdiction is statutorily limited to appeals from final judgments and certain
interlocutory orders specified by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d
191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Denials of motions to reinstate or motions for new trial are
not appealable as interlocutory. See Rovin v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., No. 14-
22-00746-CV, 2023 WL 1988300 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 14, 2023,
no pet.). Although motions to reinstate and motions for new trial extend the ordinary
deadline to file a notice of appeal, they extend it only to 90 days after the signing of
the original final judgment—not, as Appellant would have us hold, to 30 days after
the order denying the motion. See TEX. R. APP. 26.1(a).
2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 42.3(a). We dismiss
any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Chief Adams and Justice Rivas-Molloy and Guiney.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dominique Taylor v. Angela Faye Brown & Associates, PLLC. and Angela Faye Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominique-taylor-v-angela-faye-brown-associates-pllc-and-angela-faye-txctapp1-2026.