Dominique Shaquille Harvey v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 23, 2020
Docket06-19-00123-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Dominique Shaquille Harvey v. State (Dominique Shaquille Harvey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dominique Shaquille Harvey v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00123-CR

DOMINIQUE SHAQUILLE HARVEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 43683-B

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER Appellant Dominique Shaquille Harvey was convicted of injury to a child and was

sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. Harvey has appealed from that conviction and the resulting

sentence. On March 2, 2020, Harvey’s court-appointed appellate counsel, Natalie A. Anderson,

filed an Anders 1 brief, and on March 19, 2020, Harvey filed a pro se motion for access to the

appellate record for purposes of preparing a response to his counsel’s Anders brief. Harvey’s

motion for access to the appellate record is granted. Under Kelly v. State, 2 we are required to enter

an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Harvey’s access to the record.

At the Court’s request, Anderson agreed to mail a complete paper copy of the appellate

record to Harvey. On March 23, 2020, this Court mailed copies of the digitally recorded exhibits

contained in the appellate record to Harvey care of the Law Library, George Beto Unit, 1391 FM

3328, Tennessee Colony, TX 75880. Allowing fifteen days from the date this motion is granted

for the record to be delivered to Harvey and giving him thirty days to prepare his pro se response,

we hereby set May 7, 2020, as the deadline for Harvey to file his pro se response to his counsel’s

Anders brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: March 23, 2020

1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 2 Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dominique Shaquille Harvey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominique-shaquille-harvey-v-state-texapp-2020.