Dominique Reed and Dakota Hill v. Cypress Creek at South Cedar
Opinion
ACCEPTED 15-25-00197-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/21/2025 10:36 AM IN THE FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALSCHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS NO. 15-25-00197-CV AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/21/2025 10:36:26 AM DOMINIQUE REED AND DAKOTA HILL, Appellants CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk v.
CYPRESS CREEK AT SOUTH CEDAR, Appellee ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Bell County Trial Court No. 25CCV01420 Hon. Paul A. Motz, Presiding ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
NOTICE OF FILING OF DISTRICT COURT COMMUNICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellants, Dominique Reed and Dakota Hill, file this Notice to bring to the Court’s immediate
attention crucial evidence supporting Appellants' Emergency Motion for Reconsideration.
On November 20, 2025, the Coordinator for the 146th District Court sent an email
communication regarding Appellants’ pending Emergency Motion for Withdrawal of Funds.
As shown in Exhibit F (attached to the accompanying motion), this communication confirms
that the District Court requires a hearing on this emergency matter and has set the available dates
in December 2025, conditioned on opposing counsel’s agreement.
This communication constitutes irrefutable evidence that the District Court is failing to exercise
its equitable power, as the delay and the condition of opposing counsel's agreement guarantee the
execution of the Writ of Possession.
Appellants respectfully pray that the Court will IMMEDIATELY GRANT the Abatement
requested in their motion and ORDER the 146th District Court to rule on the motion to release
funds INSTANTER before the Writ of Possession is executed.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Dominique Reed
Dominique Reed, Pro Se
/s/ Dakota Hill
Dakota Hill, Pro Se
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that I conferred with opposing counsel on November 21, 2025 regarding the subject matter of this motion as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5). At this time, Appellants have received no response from opposing counsel regarding their position on this Emergency Motion.
/s/ Dominique Reed
Dominique Reed, Pro Se
/s/ Dakota Hill
Dakota Hill, Pro Se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on November 21, 2025, a true and correct copy of this motion was served via electronic filing upon all counsel of record for Appellee, CYPRESS CREEK AT SOUTH CEDAR, including Joshua Anderson and Richard Alexander Barclay, at their email addresses listed in the Appellee's filing.
/s/ Dominique Reed
Dominique Reed, Pro Se
/s/ Dakota Hill
Dakota Hill, Pro Se
Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Envelope ID: 108327162 Filing Code Description: Motion - Exempt Filing Description: NOTICE OF FILING OF DISTRICT COURT COMMUNICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY Status as of 11/21/2025 10:54 AM CST
Case Contacts
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
Brooke Broderick broderick@hooverslovacek.com 11/21/2025 10:36:26 AM SENT
Alex Barclay barclay@hooverslovacek.com 11/21/2025 10:36:26 AM SENT
Dominique ACReed dominique.ac.reed@outlook.com 11/21/2025 10:36:26 AM SENT
Joshua Anderson janderson@hooverslovacek.com 11/21/2025 10:36:26 AM ERROR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dominique Reed and Dakota Hill v. Cypress Creek at South Cedar (Dominique Reed and Dakota Hill v. Cypress Creek at South Cedar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.