Dominique Franklin v. State
This text of Dominique Franklin v. State (Dominique Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00539-CR and 04-09-00540-CR
Dominique FRANKLIN,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. 2008-CR-6844A and 2008-CR-6843A
Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 7, 2009
DISMISSED
The trial court certifications in both of these appeals state that these cases are “plea-bargain case[s], and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
Appellant’s counsel filed written notices with this court that counsel reviewed the records and, in either case, “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe these notices as an indication that appellant will not seek to file amended trial court certifications showing that he has the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dominique Franklin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominique-franklin-v-state-texapp-2009.