Dominique Daniels v. Wayne J. Dixon

District Court, C.D. California·Decided June 9, 2022·No. 8:21-cv-00223·Unknown

Opinion

Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document 74 Filed 06/09/22 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:865

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

Case No. 8:21-cv-0223-CJC-MAR

v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

This order shall govern documents produced pursuant to the Court’s June 9, 2022, Minute Order. Dkt. 73. 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Action: [this pending federal lawsuit]. 1.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 1.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 1.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document 74 Filed 06/09/22 Page 2 of 10 Page ID #:866

1 1.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 2 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 3 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 4 1.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 5 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 6 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 7 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 8 1.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 9 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 1.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 1.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 1.10 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 1.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 1.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 1.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2 Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document 74 Filed 06/09/22 Page 3 of 10 Page ID #:867

1 1.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 2 Material from a Producing Party. 3 4 2. SCOPE 5 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 6 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 7 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 8 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 9 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial will be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 3. DURATION Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the information that was designated as confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180–81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the terms of this protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 4.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 3 Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document 74 Filed 06/09/22 Page 4 of 10 Page ID #:868

1 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a 2 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 10 below (FINAL 4 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 5 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 6 authorized under this Order. 7 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 8 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 9 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this Action; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the Court and its personnel; (e) court reporters and their staff; (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; (h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit A hereto; and (2) they 4 Case 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Document 74 Filed 06/09/22 Page 5 of 10 Page ID #:869

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dominique Daniels v. Wayne J. Dixon, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Dominique Daniels v. Wayne J. Dixon (Dominique Daniels v. Wayne J. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)