Dominique Beasley v. Quail Creek Apartments
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00596-CV
Dominique Beasley, Appellant
v.
Quail Creek Apartments, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-13-006757, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 30, 2013, appellant filed her notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was
filed on September 27, and on October 21, the court reporter informed us that appellant had not
requested the reporter’s record. On December 10, we sent appellant notice that the record had not
been requested, informing her that, if she did not respond by December 20, we would consider
the appeal without the reporter’s record and her brief would be due on January 9, 2014. See Tex. R.
App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant did not respond or arrange for the reporter’s record to be filed, and on
February 13, we sent appellant notice that her brief was overdue. We informed appellant that if she
did not file her brief or otherwise respond by February 24, her appeal would be subject to dismissal.
To date, appellant has not responded to our notifications, nor has she filed her brief. We therefore
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Id. R. 42.3(b). __________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: March 28, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dominique Beasley v. Quail Creek Apartments (Dominique Beasley v. Quail Creek Apartments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.