Dominican Festival & Parade Committee, Inc. v. Velasquez
208 A.D.2d 431, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1011
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered on or about May 14, 1993, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The contract between the parties annexed to the affirmation of plaintiff’s attorney is sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether the parties had dealings during the period of time in question (see, Olan v Farrell Lines, 64 NY2d 1092). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dominican Festival & Parade Committee, Inc. v. Velasquez, 208 A.D.2d 431, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
208 A.D.2d 431 (Dominican Festival & Parade Committee, Inc. v. Velasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown Harris Stevens Residential Sales, LLC v. Oxford Capital Corp.
306 A.D.2d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)