Domínguez y Rubio v. Registrar of Property of Guayama

46 P.R. 18
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedJanuary 12, 1934
DocketNo. 907
StatusPublished

This text of 46 P.R. 18 (Domínguez y Rubio v. Registrar of Property of Guayama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Domínguez y Rubio v. Registrar of Property of Guayama, 46 P.R. 18 (prsupreme 1934).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hutchison

delivered the opinion of the court.

By the terms of subdivision 5 of section 2 of the Mortgage Daw (Comp. Stat. 1911, sec. 6686) contracts of lease for a term shorter than six years are eligible to record if they contain “a special agreement between the parties that they be recorded.” An acting registrar of property refused to record a notarial instrument in which the lessors ratified an agreement of lease into which they had previously entered. The reason assigned was that the original contract did not contain the special agreement required by article 2, supra. The original contract reads in part as follows: (Italics ours).

“The parties hereto for the considerations hereinafter mentioned covenant and agree as follows:.
“6.The lessor shall pay all taxes and water rates, and shall have this lease duly recorded,.”

This, we think was a sufficient compliance with the statutory requirement.

The ruling appealed from must be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 P.R. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-y-rubio-v-registrar-of-property-of-guayama-prsupreme-1934.