Dominguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dominguez v. State

800 So. 2d 242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9168, 2001 WL 746627

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 2001

DocketNo. 3D99-2303

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 800 So. 2d 242 (Dominguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dominguez v. State, 800 So. 2d 242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9168, 2001 WL 746627 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions, Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997, 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)(“the evidence was sufficient for a jury to find that the automobile was used as a weapon.”), review dismissed, 781 So.2d 1083 (Fla.2001), however, we strike the portion of the sentence that imposes a three-year-minimum-mandatory sentence for possession of a firearm. See § 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Convictions affirmed; three-year-minimum-mandatory sentence vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions, Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997, 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)(“the evidence was sufficient for a jury to find that the automobile was used as a weapon.”), review dismissed, 781 So.2d 1083 (Fla.2001), however, we strike the portion of the sentence that imposes a three-year-minimum-mandatory sentence for possession of a firearm. See § 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Convictions affirmed; three-year-minimum-mandatory sentence vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

800 So. 2d 242, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9168, 2001 WL 746627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack