Dominguez v. State
This text of 710 So. 2d 756 (Dominguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ramon Dominguez filed a post-conviction motion seeking an award of additional credit for the time he had served in jail. The state agrees that the allegations in the motion were legally sufficient to require either an evidentiary hearing or attachment of excerpts from the record that conclusively disprove appellant’s claim. We also agree and reverse with direction to the trial court to either hold an evidentiary hearing or attach record support to the order if the court again denies appellant’s motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
710 So. 2d 756, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5932, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.