Dominguez v. State

710 So. 2d 756, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5932, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1299
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1998
DocketNo. 98-0850
StatusPublished

This text of 710 So. 2d 756 (Dominguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dominguez v. State, 710 So. 2d 756, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5932, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1299 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ramon Dominguez filed a post-conviction motion seeking an award of additional credit for the time he had served in jail. The state agrees that the allegations in the motion were legally sufficient to require either an evidentiary hearing or attachment of excerpts from the record that conclusively disprove appellant’s claim. We also agree and reverse with direction to the trial court to either hold an evidentiary hearing or attach record support to the order if the court again denies appellant’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WARNER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 So. 2d 756, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5932, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.