Dominguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dominguez v. State

386 So. 2d 63, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17219

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dominguez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21222 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1980·No. No. 80-635·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Francisco Dominguez, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this Court having considered the record presented and the briefs on appeal, we determine (1) that it conclusively appears that petitioner is entitled to no relief; (2) that the issue raised on the petitioner’s Rule 3.850 motion was decided adversely to him on direct appeal, Dominguez v. State, 374 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and may not be reconsidered. Thomas v. State, 383 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Francisco Dominguez, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this Court having considered the record presented and the briefs on appeal, we determine (1) that it conclusively appears that petitioner is entitled to no relief; (2) that the issue raised on the petitioner’s Rule 3.850 motion was decided adversely to him on direct appeal, Dominguez v. State, 374 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and may not be reconsidered. Thomas v. State, 383 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Dominguez v. State, 386 So. 2d 63, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17219 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

386 So. 2d 63 (Dominguez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related