Dominguez v. Botiller
16 P. 241, 74 Cal. 457, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 821
This text of 16 P. 241 (Dominguez v. Botiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dominguez v. Botiller, 16 P. 241, 74 Cal. 457, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 821 (Cal. 1887).
Opinion
The judgment and order appealed from in this cause are affirmed, upon the doctrine enunciated and for the reasons given in Phelan v. Poyoreno, ante, p. 448.
We do not regard the fact that juridical possession was given before the approval of the grant by the departmental assembly sufficient to change the status of the case, or differentiate it from the case above mentioned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harvey v. Barker
58 P. 692 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 P. 241, 74 Cal. 457, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-botiller-cal-1887.