Dominguez v. Botiller
16 P. 241, 74 Cal. 457, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 821
Opinion
The judgment and order appealed from in this cause are affirmed, upon the doctrine enunciated and for the reasons given in Phelan v. Poyoreno, ante, p. 448.
We do not regard the fact that juridical possession was given before the approval of the grant by the departmental assembly sufficient to change the status of the case, or differentiate it from the case above mentioned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dominguez v. Botiller, 16 P. 241, 74 Cal. 457, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 821 (Cal. 1887).
16 P. 241 (Dominguez v. Botiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harvey v. Barker
58 P. 692 (California Supreme Court, 1899)