Dominguez v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC

221 So. 3d 699, 2017 WL 2984001, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10064
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 12, 2017
DocketNo. 4D16-3164
StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 3d 699 (Dominguez v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dominguez v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC, 221 So. 3d 699, 2017 WL 2984001, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10064 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Amaury Dominguez challenges an order awarding the servicer the costs of post-foreclosure judgment expenditures in relation to the subject property. We reverse and remand because the affidavit of additional advances filed by the servicer and not admitted into evidence was wholly inadequate to prove the amounts of the ser-vicer’s expenditures. See generally Broxmeyer v. Elie, 647 So.2d 893, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (“Where there is no proof of damages, there can be no recovery.”). On remand, the servicer must prove the expenses incurred and its entitlement to reimbursement for those expenses pursuant to the final judgment.

Reversed and remanded.

Damoorgian, Ciklin, JJ., and Harizman, Michael A., Associate Judge, concur,,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broxmeyer v. Elie
647 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 So. 3d 699, 2017 WL 2984001, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-bayview-loan-servicing-llc-fladistctapp-2017.