Dominguez v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
This text of 221 So. 3d 699 (Dominguez v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Amaury Dominguez challenges an order awarding the servicer the costs of post-foreclosure judgment expenditures in relation to the subject property. We reverse and remand because the affidavit of additional advances filed by the servicer and not admitted into evidence was wholly inadequate to prove the amounts of the ser-vicer’s expenditures. See generally Broxmeyer v. Elie, 647 So.2d 893, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (“Where there is no proof of damages, there can be no recovery.”). On remand, the servicer must prove the expenses incurred and its entitlement to reimbursement for those expenses pursuant to the final judgment.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 So. 3d 699, 2017 WL 2984001, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-bayview-loan-servicing-llc-fladistctapp-2017.