Dominguez v. Aerodex, Inc.

203 So. 2d 164, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3430
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 11, 1967·No. No. 36357·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 7, 1967.

Our consideration of the oral arguments, the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Since the case will now be heard de novo, a ruling on the petition for attorney’s fees is accordingly deferred pending final disposition.

See our opinion in Allison Developments Inc., et al. v. Rudasill et al., 202 So.2d 752.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dominguez v. Aerodex, Inc., 203 So. 2d 164, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3430 (Fla. 1967).

203 So. 2d 164 (Dominguez v. Aerodex, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradford v. FOUNDATION & MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
182 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Allison Developments, Inc. v. Rudasill
202 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)