Dominguez v. Aerodex, Inc.

203 So. 2d 164, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3430
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 1967
DocketNo. 36357
StatusPublished

This text of 203 So. 2d 164 (Dominguez v. Aerodex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dominguez v. Aerodex, Inc., 203 So. 2d 164, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3430 (Fla. 1967).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 7, 1967.

Our consideration of the oral arguments, the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Since the case will now be heard de novo, a ruling on the petition for attorney’s fees is accordingly deferred pending final disposition.

See our opinion in Allison Developments Inc., et al. v. Rudasill et al., 202 So.2d 752.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradford v. FOUNDATION & MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
182 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Allison Developments, Inc. v. Rudasill
202 So. 2d 752 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 164, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-v-aerodex-inc-fla-1967.