Dominguez, Soriano Angel

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2016
DocketWR-82,113-03
StatusPublished

This text of Dominguez, Soriano Angel (Dominguez, Soriano Angel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dominguez, Soriano Angel, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,113-03

EX PARTE SORIANO ANGEL DOMINGUEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W1211228-Y IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Dominguez v. State, No. 06-13-00164-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana

May 8, 2014) (not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. 2

The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends

that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Sixth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 06-13-00164-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. F-1211228-Y from the Criminal District Court No. 7

of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within

30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: August 24, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dominguez, Soriano Angel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-soriano-angel-texcrimapp-2016.