Dominguez-Rodriguez v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dominguez-Rodriguez v. State

553 S.W.3d 444

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 7, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105716

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 S.W.3d 444 (Dominguez-Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dominguez-Rodriguez v. State, 553 S.W.3d 444 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Ivan Dominguez-Rodriguez ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 (RSMo. 2000 ), first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.014. Movant was sentenced to 38 years' imprisonment. This court affirmed Movant's convictions and sentences on direct appeal in State v. Dominguez-Rodriguez, 471 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *445error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Ivan Dominguez-Rodriguez ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 (RSMo. 2000 ), first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.014. Movant was sentenced to 38 years' imprisonment. This court affirmed Movant's convictions and sentences on direct appeal in State v. Dominguez-Rodriguez, 471 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no *445error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 S.W.3d 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-rodriguez-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack