Dominguez-Huizar v. Holder
This text of 549 F. App'x 685 (Dominguez-Huizar v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Javier Dominguez-Huizar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the Department of Homeland Security’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting Dominguez-Huizar’s application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process violations, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
Dominguez-Huizar’s claim that the BIA denied him an opportunity to address the intervening case law on which it based its decision is not supported by the record. It follows that his due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).
Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 F. App'x 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-huizar-v-holder-ca9-2013.