Home/Supreme Court/Dominguez-Alvarado v. United States

Dominguez-Alvarado v. United States

519 U.S. 1139, 117 S. Ct. 1011, 136 L. Ed. 2d 889, 65 U.S.L.W. 3570, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 1150
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1997
DocketNo. 96-7467
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 519 U.S. 1139 (Dominguez-Alvarado v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dominguez-Alvarado v. United States, 519 U.S. 1139, 117 S. Ct. 1011, 136 L. Ed. 2d 889, 65 U.S.L.W. 3570, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 1150 (1997).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County of Santa Cruz, Cal. v. Ashcroft
279 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (N.D. California, 2003)
United States v. Thongsangoune Sayakhom
186 F.3d 928 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Kuromiya v. United States
37 F. Supp. 2d 717 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1999)
Gibbs v. Babbitt
31 F. Supp. 2d 531 (E.D. North Carolina, 1998)
United States v. Juan Melgar-Galvez
161 F.3d 1122 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Ziegler v. Ziegler
28 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Washington, 1998)
United States v. Cannabis Cultivators Club
5 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (N.D. California, 1998)
Gordon Bergelson, an Individual v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc., a Corporation, and Howard Wallack
141 F.3d 1173 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Nguyen
997 F. Supp. 1281 (C.D. California, 1998)
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
132 F.3d 949 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Christy Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Antonio J. Morrison James Landale Crawford, and Cornell D. Brown William E. Landsidle, in His Capacity as Comptroller of the Commonwealth, Law Professors Virginians Aligned Against Sexual Assault the Anti-Defamation League Center for Women Policy Studies the Dc Rape Crisis Center Equal Rights Advocates the Georgetown University Law Center Sex Discrimination Clinic Jewish Women International the National Alliance of Sexual Assault Coalitions the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence the National Coalition Against Sexual Assault the National Network to End Domestic Violence National Organization for Women Northwest Women's Law Center the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Incorporated Virginia National Organization for Women Virginia Now Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated Women Employed Women's Law Project Women's Legal Defense Fund Independent Women's Forum Women's Freedom Network, Amici Curiae. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, and Christy Brzonkala v. Antonio J. Morrison James Landale Crawford, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cornell D. Brown William E. Landsidle, in His Capacity as Comptroller of the Commonwealth, Law Professors Virginians Aligned Against Sexual Assault the Anti-Defamation League Center for Women Policy Studies the Dc Rape Crisis Center Equal Rights Advocates the Georgetown University Law Center Sex Discrimination Clinic Jewish Women International the National Alliance of Sexual Assault Coalitions the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence the National Coalition Against Sexual Assault the National Network to End Domestic Violence National Organization for Women Northwest Women's Law Center the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Incorporated Virginia National Organization for Women Virginia Now Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated Women Employed Women's Law Project Women's Legal Defense Fund Independent Women's Forum Women's Freedom Network, Amici Curiae
132 F.3d 949 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9183, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,835 Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Kyocera Corporation v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Holding Co. Lapine Technology Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Technology Corporation Lapine Holding Company Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Kyocera Corporation v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Fdba Prudential-Bache Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Technology Corporation Lapine Holding Co.
130 F.3d 884 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Lapine Technology Corp. v. Kyocera Corp.
130 F.3d 884 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Lynell R. Ewing
129 F.3d 430 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Jim Choe
129 F.3d 128 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 U.S. 1139, 117 S. Ct. 1011, 136 L. Ed. 2d 889, 65 U.S.L.W. 3570, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dominguez-alvarado-v-united-states-scotus-1997.