Domingo Torres v. Michelle Elaine Torres

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 29, 2007
Docket14-07-00766-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Domingo Torres v. Michelle Elaine Torres (Domingo Torres v. Michelle Elaine Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Domingo Torres v. Michelle Elaine Torres, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-07-00766-CV

DOMINGO TORRES, Appellant

V.

MICHELLE ELAINE TORRES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 328th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 04-CV-137797

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N


This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 14, 2007.  The notice of appeal was filed on September 10, 2007.  To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

On October 9, 2007, this court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due.  No response was filed.  After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant has not paid the filing fee in accordance with our order of October 25, 2007.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time)

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Domingo Torres v. Michelle Elaine Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domingo-torres-v-michelle-elaine-torres-texapp-2007.