Domingo Hernandez v. State
This text of Domingo Hernandez v. State (Domingo Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Appellant's brief was due June 15, 2009. The brief has not been received and appellant's appointed attorney, Leonard Martinez, did not respond to this Court's notice that the brief is overdue.
The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether the attorney it appointed to represent appellant has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter's notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than October 2, 2009. Rule 38.8(b)(3).
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Abated
Filed: August 31, 2009
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Domingo Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domingo-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2009.