Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37475
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 22, 1996·No. 95-70892·Unpublished

Opinion

94 F.3d 650

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Domingo AREVELO-CHAVEZ, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-70892.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.
Decided Aug. 22, 1996.

Before: NOONAN, THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and HAGEN*, District Judge.

ORDER**

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, on the authority of Duldulao v. INS, --- F.3d ----, 1996 WL 411447 (9th Cir.), 96 Cal.Daily Op.Serv. 5453.

*

The Honorable David Warner Hagen, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37475 (9th Cir. 1996).

94 F.3d 650 (Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,317
94 F.3d 650 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Duldulao v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
90 F.3d 396 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)