Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Ninth Circuit

Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37475

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 22, 1996

Docket95-70892

StatusUnpublished

This text of 94 F.3d 650 (Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Domingo Arevelo-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37475 (9th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

94 F.3d 650

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Domingo AREVELO-CHAVEZ, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-70892.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.
Decided Aug. 22, 1996.

Before: NOONAN, THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and HAGEN*, District Judge.

ORDER**

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, on the authority of Duldulao v. INS, --- F.3d ----, 1996 WL 411447 (9th Cir.), 96 Cal.Daily Op.Serv. 5453.

*

The Honorable David Warner Hagen, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI