Domer v. Martin
This text of Domer v. Martin (Domer v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-1035 _____________________________
CARL RANDALL DOMER,
Appellant,
v.
TANYA M MARTIN,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Russell S. Roberts, Judge.
March 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant fails to demonstrate an abuse of the trial court’s discretion and raises no facial deficiency in the final order on equitable distribution, the final order is affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Alzirghani v. Algabah, 328 So. 3d 398, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021).
BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Carl Randall Domer, pro se, Appellant.
Tanya M Martin, pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Domer v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domer-v-martin-fladistctapp-2025.