Domer v. Martin
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2024-1035
CARL RANDALL DOMER, Appellant, v.
TANYA M MARTIN,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Russell S. Roberts, Judge.
March 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant fails to demonstrate an abuse of the trial court’s discretion and raises no facial deficiency in the final order on equitable distribution, the final order is affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Alzirghani v. Algabah, 328 So. 3d 398, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021).
BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Carl Randall Domer, pro se, Appellant. Tanya M Martin, pro se, Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Domer v. Martin (Domer v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.