Domenech v. Sta-Brite Fluorescent Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Domenech v. Sta-Brite Fluorescent Mfg. Co.

187 So. 2d 36, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3693

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1966

DocketNo. 35195

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 36 (Domenech v. Sta-Brite Fluorescent Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Domenech v. Sta-Brite Fluorescent Mfg. Co., 187 So. 2d 36, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3693 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 1, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI