Domenech v. General Motors Corp.
This text of 402 So. 2d 437 (Domenech v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The appellants’ failure to offer proof sufficient to raise a jury question as to whether the design of the GM Step-Van, which allegedly caused her husband’s death, was defective so as to cause an unreasonable risk of foreseeable injury, Ford Motor Co. v. Evancho, 327 So.2d 201 (Fla.1976), requires us to affirm the directed verdict entered in favor of General Motors Corporation. See Aetna Life & Casualty Company v. Little, 384 So.2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Keyes Company v. Arvida Corporation, 360 So.2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The appellants’ other points on appeal are equally without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 So. 2d 437, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domenech-v-general-motors-corp-fladistctapp-1981.