Domenech v. Drew

256 A.D.2d 437, 683 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13519
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Domenech v. Drew. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 438

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Maurice Zedeck appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), dated December 18, 1997, which denied his motion to sever the causes of action asserted against him from those against the remaining defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In light of our determination that the plaintiffs are not entitled to partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against the defendant David Drew (Domenech v Drew, 256 AD2d 438 [decided herewith]), the order denying the appellant’s motion for a severance is affirmed (see, CPLR 603; Shanley v [438]*438Callanan Indus., 54 NY2d 52, 57). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Domenech v. Drew, 256 A.D.2d 437, 683 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 437 (Domenech v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shanley v. Callanan Industries, Inc.
429 N.E.2d 104 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Domenech v. Drew
256 A.D.2d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)