Dombroski v. Pelicano

294 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7209
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1974·No. No. 73-551·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

' PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs and heard oral argument, and upon careful consideration we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in entering a directed verdict for defendant inasmuch as the evidence adduced in the trial below presented jury questions. The principles pertaining to the directing of a verdict and the rationale for finding that a directed verdict was improper in this case are reflected in the recent decisions in Lupoletti v. Miller, Fla.App.1972, 269 So.2d 67, and Miller v. Serrao, Fla.App.1972, 261 So.2d 518.

Accordingly, the directed verdict in favor of the defendant is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and MOUNTS, MARVIN U., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dombroski v. Pelicano, 294 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7209 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

294 So. 2d 120 (Dombroski v. Pelicano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Brewer v. Pettie
294 So. 2d 120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)