Domash v. Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Service
175 N.E.2d 831, 9 N.Y.2d 889
This text of 175 N.E.2d 831 (Domash v. Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Domash v. Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Service, 175 N.E.2d 831, 9 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
[891]*891Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Ftjld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is not based on any accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Krotman v. Berke, Berke & Grill
53 A.D.3d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Claim of Roland v. Sunmark Industries
127 A.D.2d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Claim of Heuser v. United Board & Carton Corp.
58 A.D.2d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
the Claim of White v. Republic Aviation Division of Fairchild-Hiller
55 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 N.E.2d 831, 9 N.Y.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domash-v-standard-coat-apron-linen-service-ny-1961.