Domann v. United States
Opinion
[371]*371Opinion by
At the trial, the importer appeared without counsel and discussed his case at great length with the court and Government counsel. However, he was not sworn as a witness, and neither the importer nor the Government introduced any testimony. In the circumstances, therefore, the court was without any satisfactory record upon which to review the questions raised by the protests. There being nothing before the court to rebut the presumption of correctness attaching to the action of the collector, the court was constrained to overrule the protests.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
32 Cust. Ct. 370 (Domann v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.