Dolvin, Davidson & Co. v. Stovall Co.

68 S.E. 488, 8 Ga. App. 37, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 16
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 5, 1910
Docket2529
StatusPublished

This text of 68 S.E. 488 (Dolvin, Davidson & Co. v. Stovall Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolvin, Davidson & Co. v. Stovall Co., 68 S.E. 488, 8 Ga. App. 37, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

From a judgment of a justice’s court dismissing a case-for want of -prosecution an appeal to a jury does not lie. If there is error in the judgment, certiorari is the remedy to have the ease reinstated. Humphries v. Blalock, 100 Ga. 404 (28 S. E. 165); Toole v. Edmondson, 104 Ga. 776 (31 S. E. 25). Judgment afívrmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Humphries v. Blalock
28 S.E. 165 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.
31 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 488, 8 Ga. App. 37, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolvin-davidson-co-v-stovall-co-gactapp-1910.