Dolvin & Co. v. Hicks

62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 653, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 502
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 31, 1908
Docket1247
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 62 S.E. 95 (Dolvin & Co. v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dolvin & Co. v. Hicks, 62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 653, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 502 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. In an attachment case the initial affidavit may be amended by adding one or more additional grounds- of attachment to those-originally alleged. Civil Code, §5122; Fitzpatrick v. Flanigan, 106 U. S. 648 (27 L. ed. 211, 1 Sup. Ct. 369) ; Brumby v. Rickoff, 94 Ga. 429 (21 S. E. 232) ; Collins v. Taylor, 128 Ga. 789 (58 S. E. 446).

2. Testimony that an account made out against a partnership was presented to one of the members thereof, and that he acknowledged its, correctness, is prima facie proof of the correctness of the account; and, in case of a denial of the account by the partnership, is sufficient to make an issue of fact for the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari, from Bibb superior court — Judge Felton. May 26, 1908. Submitted July 17, Decided July 31, 1908. Nottingham & Cabaniss, for plaintiffs in error. L. D. Moore, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Universal Match Corp. v. Hendricks
94 S.E.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Elliott v. National Union Radio Corp.
24 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Knight v. Gaskins
99 S.E. 634 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Cleckley v. Ransom
68 S.E. 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 653, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolvin-co-v-hicks-gactapp-1908.