Dolton v. Sickel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Dolton v. Sickel

54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 39 Vroom 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 214

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dolton v. Sickel. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 N.J.L. 492 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 2, 1903·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in the Supreme Court in this cause was entered upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison, reported in 37 Vroom 492, which opinion adopted, in respect to one point involved, the opinion of the same justice in Yetter v. King Confectionery Co., reported in Id. 491.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion referred to-.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom. 8. For reversal—Dixon, Vredenburgi-i. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment in the Supreme Court in this cause was entered upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison, reported in 37 Vroom 492, which opinion adopted, in respect to one point involved, the opinion of the same justice in Yetter v. King Confectionery Co., reported in Id. 491.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion referred to-.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom. 8. For reversal—Dixon, Vredenburgi-i. 2.

Dolton v. Sickel, 54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 39 Vroom 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 214 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

54 A. 1124 (Dolton v. Sickel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related