Dolton v. Sickel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Dolton v. Sickel

54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 39 Vroom 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 214

DecidedMarch 2, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A. 1124 (Dolton v. Sickel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dolton v. Sickel, 54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 39 Vroom 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 214 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in the Supreme Court in this cause was entered upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison, reported in 37 Vroom 492, which opinion adopted, in respect to one point involved, the opinion of the same justice in Yetter v. King Confectionery Co., reported in Id. 491.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion referred to-.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom. 8. For reversal—Dixon, Vredenburgi-i. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment in the Supreme Court in this cause was entered upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison, reported in 37 Vroom 492, which opinion adopted, in respect to one point involved, the opinion of the same justice in Yetter v. King Confectionery Co., reported in Id. 491.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion referred to-.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom. 8. For reversal—Dixon, Vredenburgi-i. 2.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 39 Vroom 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dolton-v-sickel-nj-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack